email   Print

   ID or email

  Password
   Login
Password
  Change  Forgot  Help
  
  
   Community
   Join the free online community
   today and start connecting
   with compensation,
   benefits and work-life
   professionals worldwide.
   More info  Get started.
Reader Comments (9)Rating (5): PoorFairNeutralGoodExcellent
Job Titles May Help Attract, Retain, Reward in Down Economy

newsline

Job Titles May Help Attract, Retain, Reward in Down Economy

Sept. 10, 2009 — Sometimes it really is the small things that matter: A new survey shows that job titles can play a key role in corporate efforts to attract, retain and reward valued employees.

The Pearl Meyer & Partners survey found that 95% of the 388 respondents said job titles are important, with the survey indicating a variety of uses from conveying corporate hierarchy to recognizing valued employees when funds are limited.

“Flexibility is widely embraced by companies when assigning job titles,” said Beth Florin, managing director and president of Pearl Meyer & Partners’ survey practice. “Managers typically have the autonomy to customize job titles in order to reflect different divisions, regions and employee preferences.”

According to survey results, most respondents said they assign formal job titles to employees but also allow the use of a second title that is more specific to an individual’s responsibilities. However, the survey revealed less flexibility in job titling practices at senior levels of management, where consistency is considered more critical, Florin noted. Nearly half of companies maintain specific criteria for assigning key executive titles like president, executive vice president and senior vice president.

The survey also found that sought-after management titles like manager, director and vice president may be given to employees who lack direct supervisory responsibilities but who do have significant organizational responsibility. According to survey results, among senior management, the most prevalent among 21 titles used for direct reports to the CEO are executive vice president, senior vice president, and president (group/business unit/function). The most common titles for employees two levels below the CEO are vice president, senior vice president and director. There are some differences in industries, Florin said. For example, financial services companies generally use the executive vice president title more, while firms in the industrials and materials sector have more group or business unit presidents.

Regarding the communication of promotions, the survey found that generally the higher an employee in the organizational hierarchy, the more broadly promotions are communicated within the company. At the executive level, 90% of respondents make organization-wide announcements of executive promotions, and 60% said they communicate non-supervisory promotions only to the employee, according to survey results.

In the current economy, with budgets tight, organizations might consider maximizing the reward value of new titles for non-managers by extending announcements beyond just the individual to include the related department, Florin said.

Contents © 2009 WorldatWork. No part of this article may be reproduced, excerpted or redistributed in any form without express written permission from WorldatWork.


Reader Comments
Comments:
Post your Comments:  Log in  |  Register

Wed October 14, 2009 8:50 AMReport Abuse
Blair Johanson
President
Member Since: 12/1/2005
Comments: 3
 

Natalia, 

Please check out the following website for a potential solutuion to linking job titles with grade and matrix strucuture:   www.DBSquared.biz

 
Wed September 23, 2009 10:43 PMReport Abuse
Natalia Vanina, GRP
HR Director
Member Since: 5/1/2006
Comments: 1
 

Hello to all,

However, there are some cultural differences that in some countries may require to take into account other factors. We sometimes use double titles (VP Director) for Government relations people but doesn't interfere with out grade compensation system.

As for a manager title I think companies should understand and clearly communicate with the staff what the titles stand for - manage people, processes, " have significant organizational responsibility", as managers can be team leaders , experts, advisors, SMS, etc (universal titles).

Could please someone share with a positive experience of linking job titles to gradesleves and building clear and stuctured matrix ?

 
Wed September 23, 2009 12:25 PMReport Abuse
Windsor Lewis, PHR , GRP, CCP
Sr Compensation Analyst
Member Since: 11/1/2004
Comments: 101
 

I agree with Rodney!  I've had to explain many times to employees that having a manager title does not automatically entitle them to a management salary.

 
Tue September 22, 2009 1:31 PMReport Abuse
Rodney B Hulsey, CCP, PHR
Compensation & HR Consultant - Internal
Member Since: 2/10/1997
Comments: 12
 

Of course titles are important - that's why companies should be very judicious in how they use them.  I've had a lot of headaches regarding use of titles that ultimately came back to haunt the manager pushing for it.  I recommend others to be very cautious about inflating job titles.  The cost is very hard to measure, but very real.

 
Tue September 22, 2009 9:17 AMReport Abuse
Lourdes A Sierra, CCP
Sr Compensation Consultant
Member Since: 8/15/1997
Comments: 2
 

I totally agree Vasudeva.

 
Fri September 11, 2009 4:48 AMReport Abuse
Vasudeva Mirmira
Sr Director, Compensation & OD
Member Since: 6/5/1995
Comments: 2
 

Rewarding with titles is a slippery slope.  No matter what these survey results say, titles are not cheap, and using primary and secondary titles can lead to a lot of confusion not only from a recruiting standpoint, but from an internal hierarchy standpoint.